EU AccessibleStart in writing

Independent accessibility reviews · WCAG 2.2

Clear accessibility findings for EU e-commerce teams.

Reproducible evidence, manual validation, remediation priorities and retesting — delivered through focused written collaboration.

Request a written sample reviewSee independent research

No sales call required. Share one URL and the journey you care about.

Evidence before claimsPatterns before raw countsManual judgment before conclusionsPractical fixes before paperwork

What I deliver

A small, decision-ready review — not a data dump.

Each engagement is scoped around the pages and components that matter. The output is designed to help a product or engineering team decide what to fix first and why.

01

Technical screening

A focused scan of representative pages to identify repeated accessibility risks before they become expensive remediation projects.

  • Representative page and component scope
  • De-duplicated findings
  • WCAG 2.2 A / AA references
02

Manual accessibility review

Keyboard, focus, form and semantic checks that automated tools cannot reliably decide on their own.

  • Manual validation notes
  • Reproduction steps and evidence
  • Impact and remediation priority
03

Remediation & retesting

Written implementation guidance for product and engineering teams, followed by a targeted verification pass.

  • Developer-ready recommendations
  • Component-level fix strategy
  • Retest status for agreed findings

Evidence, honestly labelled

Independent research on public e-commerce sites.

These examples demonstrate review method and reporting quality. They are independent studies, not paid client engagements or endorsements by the companies reviewed.

Independent study 01

Large retail platform

A five-page review surfaced recurring accessible-name and form-relationship issues that were more useful to address as shared component problems than as isolated page defects.

Repeated UI patterns5 representative pages

Independent study 02

Fashion e-commerce

The review separated directly calculated contrast findings from tool noise and reduced repeated footer results into a small set of unique, actionable link patterns.

Contrast & de-duplication93 calculated contrast findings

Independent study 03

Mail-order retailer

Ninety automated ARIA hits were consolidated into 66 affected elements and traced to two reusable component templates, creating a clearer repair path for developers.

Component remediation2 root component templates

The useful number is rarely the scanner total. I separate directly verified findings, duplicates and component-level root causes so teams can estimate the real repair effort.

How the work runs

A traceable path from URL to retest.

The process combines automated coverage with manual judgment. Every reported issue should be reproducible and connected to a practical next action.

  1. 01

    Scope

    Select high-value journeys, representative templates and shared components.

  2. 02

    Detect

    Use multiple automated checks to find patterns efficiently — never as the final verdict.

  3. 03

    Verify

    Manually review keyboard use, focus, semantics, forms and the surrounding context.

  4. 04

    Prioritize

    Group duplicates, show user impact and turn findings into a realistic remediation order.

  5. 05

    Retest

    Re-check agreed fixes and record what passed, remains open or needs a product decision.

A low-friction working model

Professional does not have to mean meeting-heavy.

Scope, questions, evidence and decisions stay in writing. That gives your team a durable record and makes asynchronous review practical across time zones.

Describe your page or journey
You send
A public URL, priority journey and any known concern.
I return
A proposed scope, timeline and exact written deliverables.
We decide
Whether to start with a small sample, full review or retest.

About

Jackson — Independent Web Accessibility Specialist.

I help EU-facing e-commerce teams turn WCAG 2.2 findings into clear, testable engineering work. My focus is evidence quality, repeatable review steps and honest boundaries — not inflated issue counts.

Collaboration is asynchronous and written-first. Reports are provided as technical accessibility assessments, not legal advice, certification or a guarantee of compliance.

Kurz auf Deutsch

Klare WCAG-2.2-Prüfungen für E-Commerce-Teams.

Ich liefere nachvollziehbare Befunde, manuelle Validierung, Prioritäten für die Behebung und gezielte Nachtests — schriftlich und ohne verpflichtendes Verkaufsgespräch.

Anfrage schriftlich senden

Accessibility statement

This site should meet the standard it discusses.

EU Accessible aims to meet WCAG 2.2 Level AA. The site uses semantic structure, visible keyboard focus, strong colour contrast, responsive layouts and reduced-motion support.

If you encounter a barrier, email jackson@euaccessible.com. The current site uses no analytics and no tracking cookies. Last reviewed: August 2026.

A practical first step

Start with one important page, not a giant audit.

Send the URL and the user journey you care about. I will reply in writing with a focused scope and the evidence you can expect.

Request a written sample review